Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wrestling Association of Championship Krushers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request undeletion of these articles. plicit 10:23, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wrestling Association of Championship Krushers[edit]

Wrestling Association of Championship Krushers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
List of WACK episodes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unsourced (and tagged as such since 2012 without improvement) article about a shortlived television series, and a similarly unsourced separate episode list for its whopping two episodes. As always, television shows are not "inherently" notable just because they existed, and have to show evidence of passing WP:GNG on reliable source coverage about them, but there's none shown here at all -- and even if they can be salvaged with better sourcing, it would still be remarkably unclear why such a short episode list needed to be a separate article instead of just being a subsection in the main article. Bearcat (talk) 22:08, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 22:52, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:43, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.