Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uptempo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Glossary of musical terminology. Sandstein 10:16, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Uptempo[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

neologism, dictionary definition. Ridernyc (talk) 03:05, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:13, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – the term has a Wiktionary page, which is really all it needs. ^Pepper∙_piggle

Redirect and merge to Glossary of musical terminology. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:55, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect and merge per Clarityfiend. (Please make sure it is merged before deleting.) --JN 466 21:22, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect + merge per above. De728631 (talk) 18:51, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – while the term might be not as widely used as say downtempo, it is still a unique term to describe a whole style of music. While most people know what it means, many people have no idea of what type of songs the term really applies to in the modern music industry. I've added a history section to the uptempo page, so that it becomes more worthy of being included in any encyclopedia. Comment added by ShotokanTuning (talk • contribs) 08:40, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.