Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snow White and the Seven Perverts

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus, kept by default.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:55, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Snow White and the Seven Perverts[edit]

Snow White and the Seven Perverts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While some German sources may exist, I was unable to find significant coverage. WP:GNG and WP:NFILM are not met. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 23:11, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 11:02, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:11, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:11, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:11, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Original German language title: (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
  • Comment. I haven't found any RS yet, but I suspect that title is slightly incorrect: try Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL Yngvadottir (talk) 14:52, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to David Grant (producer). Age and length and genre of this animated short likely has contributed to the difficulties of sourcing the article. It exists. It can be watched online. It has been included in later collections of similar animated sextoons. It has been mentioned in books. And so while it does not meet the standards set in WP:NF for an separate article, it can at least be mentioned/listed in the article of its creator/producer. Schmidt, Michael Q. 15:16, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Cannot find much coverage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gregg1234 (talkcontribs) 13:36, 24 October 2013‎

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:55, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:25, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.