Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shivalika

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was incubate. Article will be moved to Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Shivalika. Metropolitan90 (talk) 18:23, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Shivalika[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Wikipedia:Notability (films) Tentinator 07:16, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. czar · · 07:54, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. czar · · 07:55, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. czar · · 07:55, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:52, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: There is an actress who uses that singular word as her name, and searches are thus confused. Always best to refine when possible. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:29, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Incubate per WP:NFF and TOO SOON as film appears to be nearing completion, with voice work done two months ago. While the trailer shows the animation quality is no where near that available in American cinema, the film does use the talents of enough Hindi notables that we might expect it to have coverage when actually released. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:30, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Question. Isn't this based on the assumption that the film will garner notability in the future? Are we able to incubate and hold on to an article on a film for that reason? That isn't rhetorical, I really don't know the answer. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:54, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The answer: Quote: "The incubator is a place for holding articles that do not meet Wikipedia's content criteria (WP:NOT, WP:N, WP:OR,WP:NPOV, WP:BLP, and WP:V), but a rationale has been put forward that the article meets the incubation criteria, which means there is an intention that the article can and will be improved." We both agree that this does not yet meet inclusion criteria. However, and in considering this project's inclusion of Hindi notables, guideline allows a reasonable presumption (IE: putting for a valid rationale) that, even if not ready now, this topic could well benefit from collaborative editing and be improved to serve the project while OUT of article space. Incubation does not require notability be established now, else this would be a different discussion. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 04:52, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 07:32, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Trailer: check, and publicly available. Official site: not yet. It does seem to have some credibility here. So a cleanup would probably be best here. Keep. --JB Adder | Talk 15:03, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Incubate per Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} Transcendence (talk) 22:53, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.