Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hot 16
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 03:53, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hot 16[edit]
No Ghits on subject, references do not support notability -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 03:05, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Agreed. Lose the accompanying image, too. Astrovega 03:06, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No sign of notability. I got rid of one of the references since it was just a link to the Wikipedia article on his hometown. One of the two remaining sources is his MySpace page (which is usually not accepted as a RS). Lrrr IV 03:22, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:MUSIC. There can be a new article when he knocks 50 Cent off the charts. Flyguy649talkcontribs 06:36, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom;above. Anonymous Dissident Utter 07:07, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - non-notable young rap artist.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 15:21, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 10:12, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 10:12, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Many musicians aren't that notable, but if the facts in the article pass WP:V then what's wrong with it? Gabefarkas 13:07, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.