Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dayton Buller

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. I am taking the normal editorial action of redirecting this to Colorado Rockies minor league players in the hope that a merger will be completed, but this carries no more weight than any other edit. Stifle (talk) 09:55, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dayton Buller[edit]

Non-notable minor leaguer who doesn't pass WP:ATH or WP:N. Giants27 ^T/C 02:31, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. --Giants27 ^T/C 02:40, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. --Giants27 ^T/C 02:40, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Passes WP:ATHLETE by playing in a fully professional league, unlike stated on deletion tag. Also, there is enough sources on google by a quick search to write a stub classed article that passes WP:N and WP:V. Borgarde (talk) 04:05, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Whether he passes WP:ATHLETE is debatable, but a gnews search turns up a number of promising Fresno Bee articles including this one that should satisfy WP:N.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 14:12, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Colorado Rockies minor league players per usual consensus. Secret ^account 16:33, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non notable player--Yankees10 00:31, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources found by Fabrictramp. Rklear (talk) 00:51, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non notable player; and despite the Google news article found, I still do not believe there is enough to merit a Wiki page; poor minor league numbers indicate little chance of eventual callup. Mandermagic (talk) 01:54, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Statistics or brief mentions in articles about minor league teams do not constitute "significant coverage in reliable sources," as required by WP:N. The Fresno Bee article cited by Fabrictramp isn't sufficient to satisfy notability either, IMO. BRMo (talk) 23:53, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.