Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cool Beans Productions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^talk 04:50, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cool Beans Productions[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:CORP. could not find any significant coverage. Nothing in gnews . I wonder if someone following me in AfDs will suddenly appear here as well. LibStar (talk) 10:01, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Highbeam searches identify unrelated "Cool Beans" ventures in various countries, but only a brief Coventry Evening Telegraph mention (2001) for this firm: [1] – via HighBeam (subscription required) . There is also the complication of a current Cool Beans Productions website, also based in Sheffield [2] but started 8 years after this firm ceased and apparently unrelated. That leaves reliance on the references in the article. The best is probably the Edge magazine feature, which does not appear to be available on their website search, but overall there does not seem to be enough to sustain an article as per WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 16:32, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:13, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:13, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:13, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:13, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:13, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:13, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as my searches found nothing better at all. SwisterTwister talk 07:26, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.