Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam T. Siska

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to The Academy Is.... The other band members will need to be nominated in separate AFDs or sent to PROD. --Core desat 06:46, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adam T. Siska[edit]

Virtually all content is unencyclopedic trivia. "prod" tag previously removed without justification. Hqb 06:38, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the trivia and keep everything else...oh wait, there is nothing else. Yechiel Man 07:38, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 07:42, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the trivia and there is nothing left, as pointed out above. --Stormbay 14:51, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to The Academy Is.... Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:00, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and redirect article name to band, unencyclopedic trivia only page. Non-notable separate from the band. --Dual Freq 03:08, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't delete this, because everyone else in the band has an article, and some aren't any better than this!!! So why should you only delete Sisky's????! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ziggy S. Darkside (talk • contribs) 18:39, June 22, 2007 (UTC)
- Maybe the others should be deleted as well and redirected to the band article. --Dual Freq 04:40, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per Starblind; no information worth keeping in this article. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is no excuse here if the other members' articles have content, and assertions of notability. - Zeibura ^(Talk) 11:44, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per Starblind; this entire article is nothing but random trivia that really doesn't even have any sources. Thesloth 04:38, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Starblind; 150 ghits, but not enough to base a biography on. this mentions him twice. John Vandenberg 05:05, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.