Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Weyes

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Weyes[edit]

declined at (9/0/0) ending 12:48 16 June 2005 (UTC)

Weyes has been here since March, and has recently shown remarkable alacrity in RC patrolling. There is significant community participation, and as of today, he has 3132 contributions. I think Weyes should be entrusted with janitorial duties. JFW | T@lk 12:39, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I'm very flattered, but afraid I'm going to have to decline for now. Thanks for the vote of confidence though everyone. --W(t) 14:22, 2005 Jun 10 (UTC)

Support

  1. Also love his userpage motto -- JFW | T@lk 12:44, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  2. Cool. smoddy 20:46, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  3. Excelent user. Howabout1 Talk to me! 21:34, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  4. Support. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 21:45, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  5. Support.-gadfium 02:41, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  6. Support. A keen and communicative user who'd make good use of admin tools. -- Hadal 03:54, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  7. He annoys me sometimes, which is why I am opposing is request for adminship. Therefore, I support. El_C 05:04, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  8. I normally wait for the candidate to accept, but I'll make an exception here. Come on, Weyes, accept and help maintain the excellent WP:AIV you made ;-). Shanes 05:07, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  9. Support. Deserving, hard-working Wikicitizen! FCYTravis 09:00, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Oppose

Neutral

Comments

  • This is perhaps pedantic, but Weyes has actually been with us since December 2004; however, he did not begin editing regularly until March. His consistent use of edit summaries and talk pages indicates that he has taken the time to become abreast of our policies and guidelines. -- Hadal 03:54, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • For those interested, edit counts are: Main: 1417 / 104, Wikipedia: 625 / 12, User: 68 / 862, Template: 12 / 1, Image: 8 / 5, Category: 4 / 1, Help: 3 / 1. Use of edit summaries on articles is 98%, 92% overall Demi T/C 11:41, 2005 Jun 10 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
A.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and will deal with it in the future?
A.