Jump to content

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 7

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 7[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 7, 2022.

Well-poised[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 07:11, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See Talk:Well-poised. 1234qwer1234qwer4 11:17, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 11:56, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:49, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment it would also refer to posture etiquette; balance; equilibrium; well-prepared or ready [1] -- 64.229.88.43 (talk) 21:48, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hatnote[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 15#Hatnote

Denim (color)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 15#Denim (color)

Deep peach[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:14, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article. Looks as though the section target was renamed in this edit with the claim that there is no such color as "deep peach". Otherwise on Wikipedia, the only article that seems to contain the phrase "deep peach" is Anagallis arvensis, and it does not seem to be a helpful/valid retargeting option for this redirect. Steel1943 (talk) 23:30, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. There seems to be no helpful target for this redirect. CycloneYoris talk! 07:09, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Dark pink[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 15#Dark pink

Catholic Resistance[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 00:01, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect was an unsourced article which was pure OR, on a non-notable subject; it was turned into a redirect in 2008 by an IP.
There is no mention of a "Catholic Resistance" at the current target. There is no good target for this redirect.
Therefore, this redirect should be deleted. Veverve (talk) 22:00, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Gregory XIX[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request undeletion of these articles. ✗plicit 00:01, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No mention at the target anymore. The section has been deleted. Therefore, the redirects should be all deleted. Veverve (talk) 21:51, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Soldier-King[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Soldier King. ✗plicit 23:59, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Soldier King is a recently created dab page and it feels quite odd for Soldier-King to redirect to a specific monarch when that dab page exists. As such, I propose that we retarget Soldier-King to point at Soldier King. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 19:36, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

D. B. S. Jeyaraj[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:57, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not listed at target. MB 19:31, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hong Kong Parliament Electoral organising committee[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:57, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion Reason 8 - very obscure synonym for an article name that is not mentioned in the target JaventheAldericky (talk) 17:58, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete not a synonym for the current target at all; it's an unrelated organisation in Canada [2]. If it meets WP:N someone could write a separate article for it at a properly-capitalised title, but there's nothing in this lemma's history that would help do so (just a copyvio plus an infobox). 61.239.39.90 (talk) 08:17, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Niggaracci[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 14#Niggaracci

Debut issue[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 14#Debut issue

Debut album[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 15#Debut album

Philippica[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Philippicae. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 06:47, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Currently, this spelling is not used in the target article. It is also confusing as a redirect as it is the name of (lost, I think) Ancient Greek text that might be notable anyway, and right now is blue-linked and takes the reader to the wrong place (see Theopompus, author). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:06, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's the Latin singular for the word. Cicero's Philippics are often given their Latin title, Philippicae (which is how our article on them is titled), and might be referred to in the singular when something is cited to one of them in particular. Presumably the same could be done of the Greek originals, to which the title of Cicero's speeches allude. However, it might make sense to change the target of the redirect to Philippicae, in which case the reason for having it would be more obvious. This should be an easy "keep" unless the title is needed for some other topic. P Aculeius (talk) 14:22, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 11:00, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Cal Poly Pomona green[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:26, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned/identified in the target article. Previously, this redirect targeted Shades of green#Cal Poly Pomona green, but the subject is not currently mentioned there either, in addition to the section not existing. Steel1943 (talk) 09:31, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Brad K[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:27, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Brad K" is not mentioned in the article and I can find no evidence other than Wikipedia mirrors that Kesolowski is know as "Brad K". "Brad K" is ambiguous with a music group, which I believe is the meaning of the one incoming link from Barry Grint which I have removed. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:50, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support No reason to keep the redirect. Gusfriend (talk) 09:17, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Shagos[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 16#Shagos

Mango ice cream[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 14#Mango ice cream

Sedevacantist Antipope[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 14#Sedevacantist Antipope

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2022_August_7&oldid=1104785959"