Jump to content

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 29

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 29[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 29, 2020.

Reshef the Dark Being[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 20:21, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Does not seem like a useful search term. Though it is mentioned in the redirect target, few people will be searching for an individual card here as Reshef the Dark Being is not a franchise trademark like Blue-Eyes White Dragon, Dark Magician (Yu-Gi-Oh!) or Exodia the forbidden one. 108.21.244.229 (talk) 23:42, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete for now since there's no good targets at the moment and it might cause confusion in its current target. He's the big bad for the GBA game Yu-Gi-Oh! Reshef of Destruction but said article was converted to a redirect since 2011. --Lenticel (talk) 01:41, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Big Bird, TX[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 April 8#Big Bird, TX

Harry Stanley (disammbiguation)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete -- JHunterJ (talk) 19:54, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mmmmmm...another questionably plausible mmisspelling of "disambiguation." I'm tilting towards delete on these two, as well. Regards, SONIC678 19:21, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. We should have a general rule that disambiguation redirects for which the word "disambiguation" is misspelled should be speedied. BD2412 T 19:25, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020 March 23#Kase (disambigation) was a SNOW case. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 19:31, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete the only spelling of "(disambiguation)" should be "(disambiguation)", since that's what the automated tools require -- 65.94.170.207 (talk) 03:05, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Chris Wood (disambiguuation)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G7. Thryduulf (talk) 01:19, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

While I can see someone holding the U key for a bit too long here, this misspelling's plausibility is questionable. Regards, SONIC678 19:14, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020 March 23#Kase (disambigation) was a SNOW case. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 19:31, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete absolutely. My bad. Mea maxima cuulpa Thanks for the ping. Doug butler (talk) 19:47, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Considering that is the creator of the redirect it should be a valid WP:G7.--69.157.252.96 (talk) 00:00, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I’ve tagged it.--69.157.252.96 (talk) 00:02, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Suburban Fantasy drafts[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 21:26, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Suburban Fantasy World" was apparently the working title for Onward back when it was untitled (why would it still be untitled if it now has a title?), but strangely we don't have Suburban Fantasy World in the article namespace. I'm not really sure if we should have these redirects lying around, and I'm tilting towards delete (especially the "untitled" ones) unless justification can be given. Regards, SONIC678 19:07, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • I don't know about the first one yet but delete the other 2 since Onward has a title and has been released in theaters. OcelotCreeper (talk) 20:47, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all - Unhelpful CNRs, after looking through the page history, there appear to have been no mergers, and these weren't redirects leftover from moving drafts to the articlespace, so WP:RDRAFT doesn't apply, either. Hog Farm (talk) 02:39, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete the first as well now that I had the time to think. OcelotCreeper (talk) 17:08, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Khnum-Satet-Anuket[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Anuket#Worship. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 06:01, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 19:41, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 19:02, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Juvenoia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Ephebiphobia#Juvenoia. (non-admin closure) 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 22:15, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NEOLOGISM, see wikt:juvenoia. The Wiktionary link is included in Fear of children (without further mention), so that article might be a possible target. Narky Blert (talk) 16:34, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Fear of children does not specify either what juvenoia is. OcelotCreeper (talk) 16:40, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget - This is a bit of a curious issue. Since there's a distinction between 'ephebiphobia' as the loathing of young people generally and 'juvenoia' as the distaste for the culture of young people, what with all of the challenging of traditional values, I went ahead and created the section 'Ephebiphobia#Juvenoia'. I propose going over there instead. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 13:07, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per CoffeeWithMarkets suggestion. signed, Rosguill talk 19:01, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 19:01, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

🅰[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 21:25, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We had the discussion Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 22#🄂 recently. This one is similar as 🅰 is not mentioned at the target either and may probably be used for other purposes as well, so a redirect to the symbol group Enclosed Alphanumeric Supplement might be appropriate. Also, that article links to this redirect; if it is retargeted, it could link to ABO blood group system directly to provide further explanation for the reader. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 18:58, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • I've also added 🅿 as a similar case (with different current target) to the nomination. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 20:34, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per WP:REMOJI, the ABO emojis symbolize the blood types and the P emoji symbolizes parking. -- Tavix (talk) 20:41, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep all - While alternate uses exist, indeed, for all of these redirects, there are overriding associations in every case. Things seem fine to me. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 05:12, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep all per WP:REMOJI. These all have clear defined meanings that have a clearly relevant target article. Thryduulf (talk) 12:50, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep all; straightforward REMOJI case. — J947 (user | cont | ess), at 23:47, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep all; provides interesting information about why these characters have emoji versions.Spitzak (talk) 20:08, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Slimane (disambigition)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete -- JHunterJ (talk) 19:56, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely misspelling of "disambiguation". TheAwesomeHwyh 18:56, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully we can get rid of a lot more of these such inappropriate redirects. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 16:29, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I agree. There's no particularly good reason to keep this. It's not really a plausible typo. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 16:28, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Dick Doyle (disambiguiation)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete -- JHunterJ (talk) 19:56, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely misspelling of "disambiguation". Not helpful. TheAwesomeHwyh 18:54, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Fightan gaems[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 21:25, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely typo. TheAwesomeHwyh 18:49, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Dahleate as completely nonsensical. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 19:03, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - The only way I can get this to make sense is as a phonetical spelling of a heavy drawl. Hog Farm (talk) 20:14, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ultra Super Mega Strong Delete. First off, who searches a word ending in ing with an, since the i and n are 2 spaces apart, ehilw the a and n are 7 spaces apart, and second, who searches up game as gaem, the e are far apart from each other on the keyboard. This is implausible on so many levels. OcelotCreeper (talk) 21:10, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete as unlikely misspelling --Lenticel (talk) 01:43, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Flat-nosed[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Flatnose (disambiguation). (non-admin closure) 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 10:40, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Partial title match for "flat-nosed pit viper". Not a plausible search term. Neelix creation Plantdrew (talk) 00:21, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 18:33, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

When Kirk Met Spock[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 April 5#When Kirk Met Spock

Flims[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete -- JHunterJ (talk) 19:46, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Typo and error in disambig qualifier. Existed under this title for one day. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 17:44, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merged the nominations now and commented the discussions (in all but one case only my own comments) out. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 18:36, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hiromi Fuji[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. No participants seem in favour of keeping it; plausibility of double-typo pages is questionable at best. ~ mazca talk 18:04, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Two spelling errors, would suggest deletion. signed, Rosguill talk 17:34, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Two errors is usually one too many to be plausible. Narky Blert (talk) 08:31, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Again, what you think is implausible does not matter. — J947 (user | cont | ess), at 22:07, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete; pageviews seem largely bot-driven. Slightly more harm than it's worth. — J947 (user | cont | ess), at 22:09, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mga Amang-Tagapagtatag ng Estados Unidos[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 21:24, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Redirects in languages other than English. TheAwesomeHwyh 16:54, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like this was accidentally created in the wrong language. TheAwesomeHwyh 16:57, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hеpi ТV[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 21:24, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Useless with Cyrillic Е in the title. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 13:27, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ptolomaeus Crater[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Ptolemaeus (disambiguation). (non-admin closure) ComplexRational (talk) 18:02, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't mentioned in the target article, but "Ptolemaeus" is mentioned at List of Mobile Suit Gundam SEED characters (and "Ptolemaios" at Mobile Suit Gundam 00 (both different spellings). I think it's therefore better if this is retargeted to Ptolemaeus (disambiguation). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:16, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hallow ground[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Hallowed Ground. (non-admin closure) ComplexRational (talk) 18:00, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure about this use of "hallow" as an adjective. I can't mind many RS uses that aren't poor translations or have meanings other than "holy". If it must be kept, I suggest retarget to the disambigation page Hallowed Ground. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:27, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget to the dab page, as it's a very plausible error for that term in more than one potential meaning. Thryduulf (talk) 10:29, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per above. It's a very likely misspelling. Rare adjective, and even rarer noun and verb. Narky Blert (talk) 11:46, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per above as plausible and helpful for searches. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 13:37, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • retarget to Hallowed Ground per above --Lenticel (talk) 01:44, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of college men's soccer coaches with 350 wins[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 April 6#List of college men's soccer coaches with 350 wins

Template:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic cases/WHO situation reports[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 April 5#Template:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic cases/WHO situation reports

The Letter for the King[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Procedural close: wrong forum. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:41, 29 March 2020 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

But I have to move this English title to The Letter for the King, instead of Dutch title. SwissArmyGuy (talk) 06:03, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@SwissArmyGuy: Suggest withdrawing this and submitting instead to WP:RM#TR as a WP:MOVEOVERREDIRECT meeting WP:TRANSLITERATE. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 06:12, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Unless of course a passing admin can just do this quickly... ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 06:14, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I have done this as a page mover. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:41, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

J. R. R. R. R. Tolkien[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 21:23, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's interesting why someone why someone would search his name with four "R.'s," when his name didn't have that many. I'm tilting towards delete here. Regards, SONIC678 05:52, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. No way is this useful. Narky Blert (talk) 08:01, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: this isn't his name. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:55, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dellllete- I can almost understand someone accidentally putting in one R too many, but two? Not plausible. Reyk YO! 10:52, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This isn't Woooo! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 13:41, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as just plain silly. SNALWIBMA ( talk - contribs ) 15:49, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. rredirrect is an implausible typo. OcelotCrreeperr (talk) 16:52, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as nonsense. Hog Farm (talk) 20:15, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Look. Nothing in R#CRD says that this should be deleted. D8 doesn't really, it says: If the redirect is a novel or very obscure synonym for an article name, it is unlikely to be useful. However, this has been useful—to over 400 readers in the past 3 years. Also, D8 is inferior to RHARMFUL, which concludes in: Therefore consider the deletion only of either harmful redirects or of recent ones. Is this harmful? No. Is this recently created? No.
    Sure, it may be searched often just as a joke—but hey, redirecting them is better than putting them on a screen where they can start a draft with the Article Wizard. It can become a huge waste of time if they follow through with that process. Also, it isn't always a joke search—when multitasking you can get a bit forgetful, and your fingers may repetitively follow the same pattern on the keyboard. In that scenario, a straight redirect simply reduces the number of needless clicks.
    Furthermore, what is to be gained from deleting this redirect? The clogging-up-search-engines argument doesn't apply in this case, as the redirect will only show up if you search up 'J. R. R. R.'. When that happens for me there is no direct link in the search results to J. R. R. Tolkien—only the redirect being immensely helpful in helping readers navigate to the primary topic. As such, nothing is to be gained by deleting this redirect—other than useless drafts and annoyed readers. — J947 (user | cont | ess), at 20:37, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per J947 and redirects are cheap. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:37, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Implausible nonsense. —Xezbeth (talk) 08:23, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete not a plausible search term. LEPRICAVARK (talk) 16:10, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per J947. We have nothing to lose from this redirect. Anyone looking for the "real" J. R. R. R. R. Tolkien can go here.Renerpho (talk) 14:40, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. From my view, this discussion has so far been delete !voters asserting that the redirect is implausible, or nonsense, or both – and keep !voters saying with evidence that implausibility/your view of nonsensicality does not matter. I wonder which posits the stronger argument... — J947 (user | cont | ess), at 20:47, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Would this typo be needed if one uses the search bar? I spell many searches wrong, yet the hovering suggested results understand what I mean. If someone uses too many Rs, I imagine the search engine would show them the correct page with the correct spelling. —MonkeyStolen234 (talk) 23:30, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kangarooo (2014 film)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 21:23, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect was moved to the correct spelling (even though the misspelling could be plausible) back in 2014 (the supposed year of its release, which was deleted over half a year ago) and survived all these years since the move. I don't think it makes sense to retain this when the correctly spelled one has already been deleted. Regards, SONIC678 05:47, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Halloweeen (2007) remake[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 21:23, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

...another interesting redirect with three consecutive repetitions of a letter (not in its official title), this time from (maybe) holding the E key for too long. I'm leaning towards deleting this. Regards, SONIC678 05:25, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Misspelling, and a malformed qualifier. Narky Blert (talk) 08:03, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The target isn't a remake of Halloween (2007). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:56, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Deleeete due to multiple errors. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 13:29, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Deleeete as above. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 13:40, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Article titles mentioning it is a remake would be "Film name (year remake)". The 3 e's instead of 2 could be a plausible typo though. OcelotCreeper (talk) 18:00, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete as unlikely misspelling --Lenticel (talk) 01:45, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I do want to say, though, that 'Halloweeen' itself, while an unlikely typo, appears to have at least some worth. This particular redirect isn't worth keeping. I would be way more on the fence if it were 'Halloweeen (2007 movie)' or something like that. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 05:23, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete too many problems to be useful. LEPRICAVARK (talk) 16:13, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

SS Elllen[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy deleted. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:59, 29 March 2020 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

While SS Laura was renamed Ellen in 1881, her name didn't have three "L's" in it. I'm thinking we should delllete this redirect for that reason. Regards, SONIC678 05:18, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

George Washington between the wars[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 08:49, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely search term. Formerly an article. TheAwesomeHwyh 03:08, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment WP:MAD Merge and Delete -- this was an article that was merged into the target article, so the WP:EDITHISTORY must be kept around somewhere. You could rename the redirect to some more useful name instead, and keep the edit history attached to it. Per WP:CWW this information needs to stay around. -- 65.94.170.207 (talk) 08:58, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per WP:MAD. The title is not in the way of anything else so it's best left where it is. Thryduulf (talk) 10:32, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep for WP:ATT purposes and tag with {{R from Merge}}. Hog Farm (talk) 20:16, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as per above, also has got a nice number of pageviews. Pinging Tavix as he merged this redirect back into George Washington, and because he is an RfD regular. — J947 (user | cont | ess), at 20:46, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Given how the redirect is reasonably helpful as is, all previous edit history aside, I'm inclined to disagree with deletion. As it stands when including the edit history, we should absolutely keep this. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 05:21, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Flag of Arunachal Pradesh[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 April 5#Flag of Arunachal Pradesh

Flag of Uttarakhand[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 April 5#Flag of Uttarakhand

Cheetah (Rappper)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 21:22, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I can see someone holding the P key for too long here, but this misspelling doesn't seem to be plausible, and this seems to be more useless search bar clutter. Regards, SONIC678 00:23, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Clouds (ssong)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 21:22, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't ssee why ssomeone would ssearch with this missspelling ass a common noun, other than holding the S key for too long. Maybe delete thesse redirectss, unlesss a jusstification can be provided. Regardss, SSONIC678 00:13, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: we shouldn't have redirects with misspellings or typos in a common disambiguator. These two redirects were the result of typos in the title upon creation, in both cases amended almost immediately. – Uanfala (talk) 00:57, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above. Unnecessary clutter. Narky Blert (talk) 08:09, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as an obvious typo. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:05, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ddelete as above. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 13:39, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete per above --Lenticel (talk) 01:46, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete both - I agree. These aren't useful. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 16:33, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_March_29&oldid=955617839"