Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 January 26

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 26[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 26, 2019.

Beagle(beer)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:20, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB, missing space and Beagle (beer) exists to same target (which doesn't mention it, anyway). 94.21.204.175 (talk) 16:29, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Latest stable software release template[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:33, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

These are cross-namespace redirects from mainspace to category space, about project/template business. All-time usage is negligible and I recommend delete. Pageviews are at https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&start=2015-07&end=2018-12&pages=Latest_stable_software_release_templates|Latest_stable_software_release_template, but I can't work out how to encode vertical bar Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:56, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In a raw link the vertical bar works just fine, I just copied yours above to:
stats here
but you can encode it inside a template as |. 94.21.204.175 (talk) 16:40, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Incredible Hulk (cocktail[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 00:45, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB, missing closing parenthesis. 94.21.204.175 (talk) 14:26, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bolero (drink)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 17:24, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RFD#D10. Circular reference, the only article that links to it is the target, with a bare mention in a list. Neither this nor the target is at Bolero (disambiguation). 94.21.204.175 (talk) 13:46, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of notable thefts[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 17:24, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:RDEL #5: Redirect makes no sense - thefts are not synonymous with the specific act of robbing a bank. As there is no article on a list of notable thefts as yet to which this redirect can be pointed towards, this redirect should be deleted. ― A Poor Historian (talk) 13:04, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct. I am working on an article for a list of notable thefts throughout history, including bank robberies.--Wyn.junior (talk) 17:43, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That reinforces the argument for deleting these redirects. If the intended target for these redirects has not yet been created, then these redirects are completely unnecessary and should be removed per WP:RDEL #7. They can always be recreated once the primary article has been written. ― A Poor Historian (talk) 08:31, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Annelise Manojlovic[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 17:23, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

While the target mentions her, it is just by a name mention and nothing more. Meaning it has no purpose for a reader who wants to know about her, further proved by the redirect's number of views per https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&start=2018-12-27&end=2019-01-25&pages=Annelise_Manojlovic. Not every non-notable actor has to have a redirect to this article. Fails WP:RDEL Criteria 10 as "the target article contains virtually no information on the subject" Jovanmilic97 (talk) 10:35, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:YOUARENOTALAWYER[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:32, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Only nine pageviews in the last year and this and the redirect's target don't have any link together. Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:04, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

普莉希拉·陳[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:28, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't a Chinese name, just a transcription into Chinese characters of her English name, and IMO fails WP:FORRED as an unlikely search term for the target. (FWIW, I don't believe the target's actual Chinese name is known publicly.) 59.149.124.29 (talk) 06:37, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

RedJak(drink)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. No comment on Redjak ~ Amory (u • t • c) 00:45, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB, no space before parenthesis. Redjak already redirects to Energy drink (which doesn't mention it). 94.21.204.175 (talk) 02:15, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Problematic main-to-project/main-to-portal redirects[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:23, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete So I understand and agree there are good reasons for a very limited number of redirects from mainspace to project-related pages, such as Wikipedia help, Wikipedia Manual of Style and Wikipedia editing, but in my opinion these mainspace redirects all cross that limited borderline and should be deleted. Note that the first one listed was previously nominated, here UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:12, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment I've now replaced the only use of the 'Wikipedia's First Commandment' redirect, and I've no problem with deleting it. I've no views either way about deleting the other redirects. Tlhslobus (talk) 08:29, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Without evidence of a pressing need, such as demonstrated user traffic, delete all of this. I previously advocated in 2014 at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2014_December_5#Wikipedia/Education_program for keeping some links which a third party publication mistakenly published linking the wrong pages. Now I regret that view, and think that we should expect publications to correct themselves and not for Wikipedia to accommodate them. In other cases, like Wikipedia's help pages, if these concepts ever meet notability then of course mainspace encyclopedic coverage will take priority over redirects even if many users search for the Wikipedia space in these. For these others, we have no evidence that any significant number of users would be disrupted by applying the usual rules and deleting them. Blue Rasberry (talk) 16:23, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • I just added three more which I previously created. Blue Rasberry (talk) 16:29, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
      • Prior deletion discussions for the final four are linked from their respective talk pages. UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:55, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all as unneeded cross-namespace redirects. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 17:44, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Wikipedihol, because no such thing exists in real life nor has ever existed. 193.210.230.171 (talk) 14:54, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2019_January_26&oldid=881919053"