Jump to content

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 February 14

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 14[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 14, 2018.

List of destinations served by ferries fron the port of Piraeus[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:39, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just a redirect because of a minor typo in the original word "from" in the title. Pointless to retain. Nick Moyes (talk) 23:55, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Seems pointless and egregiously unlikely. Joefromrandb (talk) 01:57, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete was a result of the page move and should have been cleaned from there. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 18:25, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • Missed opportunity, perhaps, but five months is not recent enough for WP:CSD#R3. ~ Amory (utc) 23:04, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

PlayStation(R)4[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:41, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Should be deleted per MOS:TMRULES. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 22:05, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 21:00, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Gabriel (footballer)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Gabriel (disambiguation). As noted in this discussion, anyone known mononymously as Gabriel should be on that page. --BDD (talk) 16:54, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest redirecting this to the Disambiguation page for Gabriel as there are currently many Gabriel's that play football. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 18:26, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note for closer: I'm hoping that the closer here will also close the move request at Talk:Gabriel Vasconcelos Ferreira#Requested move 30 January 2018 so that we don't have any dispute over which process supersedes the other. (In the absence of this discussion, I would already have moved that page and this would no longer be a redirect to be discussed.) Dekimasuよ! 04:19, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 06:50, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Machine gun nest[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 February 21#Machine gun nest

Studium provinciale[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 February 22#Studium provinciale

Gerald Yao[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted per G8. -- Tavix (talk) 15:48, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

not mentioned on the page linked to. DGG ( talk ) 09:02, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hook Ya Crook (film)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted per WP:G8. The redirect technically depends on the article Hook Ya Crook, which was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hook Ya Crook. If it wasn't for a bizarre redirect-fixer bot move during the AfD, it would have been deleted then. -- Tavix (talk) 20:59, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A redirect from a film to a director, and while it appears that Dhawan was the director, this film doesn't seem to be listed in his article. FWIW, Hook Ya Crook is a red link. Suggest red link this one to encourage an article. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:59, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hoolahoop[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Killiondude (talk) 20:59, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non-notable spelling of the name. It reads like someone's attempt to brand the product, but even then there are no news or general articles for this. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 03:00, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Pageviews since its creation suggest it's not a common typo.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 14:14, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. This strikes me as a plausible phonetic spelling with, as far as I know, no risk of causing confusion or sending the reader to an unexpected target. Notability is a test we use to decide whether a topic warrants an article; it has nothing to do with redirects. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 16:49, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
That assumes the audio searches will favor hoola over hula, and there's no evidence this is common enough to warrant this. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 18:30, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I wasn't thinking of anything as high-tech as that – I was just imagining a reader who is unsure of how the term is spelled and so spells it in a way that seems to make sense. Obviously what is and isn't plausible in that regard is a subjective matter and reasonable opinions might differ quite a lot. The key point though is that there's no obvious harm done by having this – no risk of creating confusion or misinforming the reader – so no obvious reason to delete it. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 21:13, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Transit (Christian Petzold (director))[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:41, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

overspecified with the extra parentheses for director AngusWOOF (barksniff) 02:12, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wing Commander: Privateer redirects[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 20:59, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:GAMECRUFT details not described in the video game article. Items, locations, weapons, and races. These were all created by a single editor. This is WP:NOTWIKIA, should not house every object or term from the game. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 02:09, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all As pure gamecruft.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 14:12, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • IMHO keep Are you sure WP:GAMECRUFT applies also to redirects? Locations are not mentioned in the policy and redirects are not articles. We are not talking about a pointless description of these locations. Citing the names of the major star systems could be interesting and meaningful considering it is a game focused mainly on exploration. Moreover these redirects are harmless WP:Paper, useful as placemark for future disambiguations and... well if a reader, even one time per year, digits "New Constantinople" then I believe he should be kindly redirected to that page. I could add a star system list in the article to give more context to these redirects. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 13:19, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, gamecruft applies to redirects. They would have to be strongly notable to warrant a R without mention tag. And please don't add lists of star systems or gameplay items. That would definitely conflict with WP:GAMECRUFT #7 (lists of levels, list of weapons, list of items). If any of those terms are critical to the understanding of the game, please work that into the plot and gameplay sections. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 18:36, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Warren Graham[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 February 21#Warren Graham

Ronaldo's[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 February 21#Ronaldo's

Friedrich Knollenberg[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was procedural close. The page is no longer a redirect. -- Tavix (talk) 15:50, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects to a Surname disambiguation page, which is not very helpful, and stifles article creation. Unless someone wants to create an article in English, this name should be deleted, and in the meantime be linked as Friedrich Knollenberg as needed. --Animalparty! (talk) 01:42, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

no problem, I'll create the article now. Please don't delete, leave with me. DrVogel (talk) 01:51, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
have a look now! much better :) We have an article now. DrVogel (talk) 02:35, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • speedy close. As RFD nominator, I retract my previous comment: as a stub has been created, the title is no longer redirect, and this discussion can close. --Animalparty! (talk) 05:43, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Joap[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 February 22#Joap