Jump to content

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 March 30

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 30[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 30, 2013

Jang shin young(actress)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Amory (u • t • c) 22:50, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely formulation (no space before bracket). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:39, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: implausible search term, no meaningful incoming links. – Wdchk (talk) 01:50, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Neko Case Tigers are Noble[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Thryduulf (talk) 09:36, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete AFD nom made by ChakaKong (talk · contribs) and finished by Train2104 (talk · contribs). Rationale was "I'm not sure why this page was ever created. It's not the name of a song or an album Case has ever recorded or released. It redirects to her album The Tigers Have Spoken but there is no song on the album by that name. "Tigers are Noble" is simply a phrase she says during some pre-song banter." Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 19:38, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as nonsense/unlikely search term. --BDD (talk) 23:25, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Maximiliano Hernández[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete without prejudice to writing an article if he becomes notable. Thryduulf (talk) 09:38, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with the idea of redirecting an a real person to a fictional person. Especially since the role is a very minor one (I've seen all of the films multiple times and I have no idea who he is). JDDJS (talk) 19:21, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe create an article stub? The actor is picking up traction seeing as the character he plays has been in three Marvel movies, and could quite possibly star in the upcoming SHIELD TV series and he is now a main cast members in The Americans (2013 TV series).Rusted AutoParts 20:23, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Yeah redirecting to the fictional character is pretty obviously a bad idea. And speculation that he may star in a future series is just that, speculation. However, given his starring role in The Americans and his recurring, albeit minor, role in the Marvel films, I could potentially see an article working at this point. -Fandraltastic (talk) 00:31, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
We already had a discussion about this. He is currently not a notable actor. The Americans (2013 TV series) is still very new, and who is to say how long his character will be on the show for. They might write/kill him off. Maybe in the future, he should get an article, but not now. JDDJS (talk) 17:23, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Right, I'm aware that you already had a discussion, and that an article was deleted. However only two people commented on the previous discussion, and that was before he had a starring role in a television series. I'm not saying he should definitely have an article now, just that one could theoretically be written as he is more notable than he was 6 months ago when the page was deleted. -Fandraltastic (talk) 18:00, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

LSU Journal of Energy Law and Resources[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was moot. Non-admin-closed AfD reopened and redirection reverted. As this is no longer a redirect it's no longer within the scope of RfD, anyone with an opinion about whether it should be a redirect is encouraged to contribute to the AfD. Thryduulf (talk) 00:20, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I closed an AfD for a topic that had reliable primary sources and without any known secondary references, so as to boldly redirect the topic to where it was already included in the encyclopedia.  The nominator of the AfD has objected, and insists on my talk page that the AfD discussion be restored.  After the bold redirect, I added some primary references, both independent and non-independent to the target article, including two from Worldcat and one from Aladin as shown here, but note that of the five references I added, only one remains.  Back to the redirect, there is a limited edit history, and I merged one idea over to the target article, but did so with a rewrite, so there is no WP:MAD attribution problem if the edit history is deleted.  My role here is as a proxy for the AfD nominator who wants this redirect deleted, and I will not be offering a !vote. Unscintillating (talk) 19:05, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment I am the nominator mentioned above and Unscintillating is misrepresenting my position. I am not asking for this redirect to be deleted and you are not my proxy. I opened a valid AfD for an existing article. It was prematurely (non-admin) closed as "speedy keep". Instead of reverting that erroneous decision, you're just complicating things with this RfD. --Randykitty (talk) 20:18, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • In your last post to me before I opened this RfD, you state, "...I propose deletion."  Not sure that there is anything else I should say.  Unscintillating (talk) 21:02, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't care about any redirect and I told you so. I proposed an article for deletion and you start talking about a redirect, after an inappropriate AfD closure followed by an inappropriate redirect, which I have now repeatedly asked you kindly to revert both. As for this discussion, I call for a "speedy close" as an inappropriate discussion. Unscintillating, you can start an AfD or RfD discussion on behalf of an IP that has clearly stated thier intentions, because they cannot do that themselves. To do this for an established editor is patronizing at best. Please do not ever act as a proxy for me again. Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 22:16, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have reverted the NAC, which in my opinion was done incorrectly. This discussion should be closed, at least while the AfD runs its proper course. Drmies (talk) 23:10, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Where's Officer Tuba?[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Thryduulf (talk) 09:40, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Erroneous redirect created by me which should really be a redlink. Not the same as Where's Officer Tuba but rather the title of a 1986 film. France3470 (talk) 15:19, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

1907–08 IAAUS men's basketball season[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. With no further opinions forthcoming and no actual objections to the nomination I'm closing this as delete. Thryduulf (talk) 09:58, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both. These season article redirects are misleading because there is more content to those seasons than just who the national champions are. There are conference standings, rule changes, All-American selections, and other miscellany that should be included in their own stand-alone season articles. WikiProject College Basketball will eventually get around to creating those articles; just because they're red-linked now (in {{NCAA Division I men's basketball season navbox}}) doesn't mean they will be forever. It's better to have a red-link than a redirect blue link to an article not even exclusively about college basketball. Jrcla2 (talk) 19:15, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • I just moved the destination article, and I've updated the request accordingly. --BDD (talk) 20:25, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete per nom, though I don't see why we couldn't just use {{R with possibilities}}. --BDD (talk) 21:33, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Relisting comment: I'd like other opinions on the suggestion to use {{R with possibilities}}.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Thryduulf (talk) 13:54, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Coldplay's forthcoming world tour[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Amory (u • t • c) 13:19, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is time-sensitive, so could cause confusion when it goes out of date. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 07:26, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Piggybacked entry[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Amory (u • t • c) 22:50, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete because (1) Subject is not named or discussed on target page, (2) It is not clear what the subject means, (3) There is no history on the redirect page to explain why it is there, and (4) There are no incoming links to explain what the subject means. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 04:33, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Math.fabs()[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Thryduulf (talk) 09:44, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete because (1) Subject is not named or discussed on target page, (2) It is not clear what the subject means, (3) There is no history on the redirect page to explain why it is there, and (4) There are no incoming links to explain what the subject means. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 04:26, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Inscrutable. --BDD (talk) 23:50, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Nach Punjaban Nach[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Thryduulf (talk) 09:45, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete because (1) Subject is not named or discussed on target page, (2) It is not clear what the subject means, (3) There is no history on the redirect page to explain why it is there, and (4) There are no incoming links to explain what the subject means. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 04:21, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Opaque. --BDD (talk) 23:50, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pre-implantation labeling controversy[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 April 9#Pre-implantation labeling controversy

ASCII Art Farts[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Amory (u • t • c) 22:49, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete because (1) Subject is not named or discussed on target page, (2) It is not clear what the subject means, (3) There is no history on the redirect page to explain why it is there, and (4) There are no incoming links to explain what the subject means. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 04:03, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak keep this one, at least. It is barely plausible, and can't cause any confusion. 168.12.253.66 (talk) 13:43, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, may confuse people into expecting some discussion of the topic. Siuenti (talk) 21:54, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

GameTribe[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 April 9#GameTribe

Six Point Harness[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Made into article; thanks Mmmichaeljohnson! ~ Amory (u • t • c) 22:46, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, for all I can tell these are unrelated or barely-related companies; the target page has no information whatsoever on Six Point Harness and will not help readers looking for that term. Someone at IRC claimed they were actually competitors, but I don't guarantee for that. Huon (talk) 03:03, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2013_March_30&oldid=1146383766"