Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 June 6

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 6[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 6, 2010

NBN3 (Thailand)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Deleted. For future reference, page move vandalism can be tagged for speedy deletion. You don't need to list such cases here. -- JLaTondre (talk) 13:06, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Redirect created as result of page-move vandalism. Paul_012 (talk) 08:23, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

2012 apocalypticism[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Nomination Withdrawn. Lenticel (talk) 01:56, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Created by a reversion of a move to "apocalypticism" without support. Improbable redirect. Wrong part of speech — Arthur Rubin (talk) 07:08, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note. Yesterday's nomination was to delete the redirect to allow the article to be moved to the "apocalypticism" name, which was properly closed as being irrelevant to the move. I'm proposing it be deleted as being improbable. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 07:08, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't see any harm that this redirect does; some people even advocated for it as the title of the article. So keep. —Кузьма討論 07:57, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - This discussion may resolve things. However, even if that does not result in a page move this is both harmless and a foreseeable search term. We have a page Apocalypticism so I don't see why '2012 apocalypticism' is not foreseeable and the fact that someone wants the page at this title is another indication. Bridgeplayer (talk) 14:50, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep-As mentioned above, several editors are advocating "2012 apocalypticism" as an article title. Even if consensus decides against that move, the very proposal is evidence that it is a plausible search term.--Fyre2387 (talk • contribs) 19:01, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - plausible search term; indeed, a plausible alternate title for that article. Robofish (talk) 22:15, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Withdraw (in the absence of any support), although Bridgeplayer is misinterpreting the facts. There is a redirect here because an editor moved it there, and I moved it back. That editor is the only one who can say whether the move was plausible. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 01:52, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2010_June_6&oldid=616126224"