Jump to content

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2007 April 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 1[edit]

Reversal of Fortune (2005 film) (disambiguation)Reversal of Fortune (disambiguation)[edit]

The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 02:22, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Useless redirect that seems to have been created in error. PC78 10:36, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, per nom. Abeg92contribs 10:51, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete 100% uneeded, because there was only one movie made that year with that particular name. TheBlazikenMaster 21:13, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

CHECKUSER -> Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser[edit]

The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 02:23, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Useless cross namespace redirect, especially when it's in ALLCAPS. MER-C 09:46, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, but they are discouraged by policy except where absolutely necessary. Please read Wikipedia:Redirect#When_should_we_delete_a_redirect section 5: [delete if]...it is a cross-space redirect out of article space, such as one pointing into the User or Wikipedia namespace. Walton Vivat Regina! 19:29, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Category:Computer and video game compilationsCompilation (games)[edit]

The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 02:24, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This category was moved to Category:Video game compilations after a CFD a while ago. The category had one or two incoming links, so it was re-created as a redirect to a related mainspace page. The incoming links have been fixed to point directly to that page. There's now really no need for this cross-namespace redirect. I guess it might make sense to make it a cat redirect to the new category, but I don't think that is necessary. --- RockMFR 02:42, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as I can't see how a redirect from a category to an article is useful. I also don't see a cat redirect necessary. mattbr 08:28, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Redirects from Categories to mainspace don't work and soft redirect seems unnecessary. --After Midnight 0001 12:45, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Digital Opportunity Index (DOI)International Telecommunication Union[edit]

The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 02:25, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This was originally a stub nominated for deletion at AfD. I moved the article to Digital Opportunity Index while the debate was on-going, because I didn't think the name needed disambiguation. The concensus was to merge, and after the merge, I turned both names into redirects. However, the name still doesn't need disambiguation, and this seems like a very unlikely search target, and the article history is faithfully preserved at Digital Opportunity Index, so deleting this seems sensible and will not violate the GDFL. The only thing linking to it is the original AfD, and that also has a link to the new redirect. Xtifr tälk 11:47, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Head CrusherGreg[edit]

The result of the debate was Speedy delete by John Reaves per WP:CSD#G10. Mr.Z-mantalk¢Review! 21:47, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fairly obvious reasons. This is probably a joke. Tozoku 17:13, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Iranian Support for Lethal Activity in IraqIranian support for Iraqi insurgency[edit]

The result of the debate was Withdrawn. -- JLaTondre 11:47, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In order to undo a page move commited by mistake. GregorB 20:19, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn, will be handled by Wikipedia:Requested moves. GregorB 11:01, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.