Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2015 November 8

< November 7	November 9 >

November 8[edit]

File:Shonen's Column.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. I recognized the character as Wikipe-tan, and was able to find the Commons file. The copyright status is the only thing to be discussed at PUF, and requesting deletion for other reasons should be taken to WP:FFD. — ξ ^xplicit 07:29, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shonen's Column.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

No source for the character on top of the column. Stefan2 (talk) 00:18, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Look for it. It's not hard to find. When I stated "This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License", I was not telling lies. --RexxS (talk) 00:35, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- A source must be provided, and others should not have to guess what source you have used. If your claim about the picture being licensed under CC-BY-SA 3.0 is correct, then the file is currently a copyright violation unless you created the picture of the character yourself, because that licence states that "If You Distribute, or Publicly Perform the Work or any Adaptations or Collections, You must, [...] provide, reasonable to the medium or means You are utilizing: (i) the name of the Original Author (or pseudonym, if applicable)" but the name of the original author has not been provided. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:48, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - I've supplied the name of the original author as they deserve to be attributed, and I apologise to them for that omission. I dispute your right to demand the source just for your personal convenience, as nobody but yourself is disputing my assertion that the file is released under a free licence. You are either going to have to accept my word per WP:AGF - just as we all do for photographers - or you can ask politely for the source if you want to check for yourself. Empty threats of non-existent copyright violations are not going to get you anywhere. --RexxS (talk) 13:20, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    - See {{di-dw no source}}. A source should always be provided so that the information can be verified by others. Compare with WP:V for text which is added to Wikipedia articles. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:53, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      - The derivative image complies with all conditions of the licences of the images from which it was derived. A template is not policy and you fail to quote any policy that supports your assertion that I must supply a source. Asking >> demanding, and I don't intend to be bullied by self-appointed image-police. --RexxS (talk) 20:52, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
        The template obviously tells what policy says (in this case WP:F4), as the template otherwise would have been deleted long ago under WP:T2 long ago. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:00, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I would say delete the image regardless of copyright status because it's a just silly unencyclopedic nonsense that's served whatever purpose it had and it's now just sitting in an old talk page archive. Kelly ^hi! 01:37, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PhilippTseytlin1939.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:07, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:PhilippTseytlin1939.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

If the uploader didn't take the photo, it's unlikely he's the copyright holder. Adam9007 (talk) 01:31, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It says that the photo was taken by an "unknown family member" but it doesn't say whose family. If it was a member of the uploader's family, then the uploader might be the heir of the photographer. If it was a member of the family of the subject of the photo, then the situation is presumably different. Note that the file also has been uploaded to c:File:Tseytlin1939.PNG. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:56, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Extreme Rules poster.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:07, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Extreme Rules poster.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Reverse google search [1] shows image is widely used elsewhere. Promo poster for professional wrestling unlikely to be freely licensed. BethNaught (talk) 09:16, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note that the file has been overwritten and that there are two pictures in the file history. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:57, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WWE Survivor Series 2015 Official Poster.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:07, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:WWE Survivor Series 2015 Official Poster.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Unlikely uploader is author and has copyrights. Promo poster for professional wrestling unlikely to be freely licensed. BethNaught (talk) 09:17, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note that the file has been overwritten and that there are two pictures in the file history. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:57, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dictalicense livelyevent.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dictalicense livelyevent.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Limited contribution history by uploader, and user talk page indicates a history of copyright problems. Kelly ^hi! 15:26, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I'm not convinced. The uploader has a short history with not adding license tags, which does not necessarily mean this would be a copyright violation. This archive link from the source cited in the file description would also indicate that the uploader on that site is the same as on this site. — ξ ^xplicit 07:29, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ivan Drach crop.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:07, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ivan Drach crop.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Commons source File:Ivan Drach 4.JPG has no evidence of permission. Kelly ^hi! 15:56, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Loyola.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. I would like to note that the previously deleted files under this name contained entirely different images. — ξ ^xplicit 07:29, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Loyola.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Seems to be a page from a book. No evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder. Adam9007 (talk) 18:21, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Might need to be re-catogorized for correct licensing but was advised to place it under the cc zero code - public yearbook from == Loyola Evergreen Annual ==

1998 Vincent Valdemira class of 1998 Author and Photographer Loyola University Maryland 4501 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21210 410.617.2000 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goodfellabear (talk • contribs) 19:44, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

- - See WP:CONSENT. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:55, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The closing admin should note that the file also is discussed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2015 November 8#File:Loyola.jpg. The closure should also be based on comments to that discussion. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:55, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.