Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Hopiakuta/ ∴

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete all. (except talk page archives) Beeblebrox (talk) 23:56, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Hopiakuta/ ∴[edit]

I can't see any valid use for this page, and since the user who created it is blocked for incompetence it is unlikely it will ever be developed into something with a clear purpose related to Wikipedia. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:46, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as G6 housekeeping - no point in wasting time on this. Bencherlite ^Talk 21:50, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
(Update) That goes for all the user and talk pages apart from the talk page archives - and I stand by the use of G6 to do this speedily, as this really is uncontroversial maintenance given the "content" in them. We don't need to discuss this for a week. Bencherlite ^Talk 23:45, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There's quite a few more as it turns out. I'm just about to go have lunch but afterwords I will bundle them all I into this nom and we can see about getting rid of them all. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:51, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - general tidying up after blocked/banned editor. --Orange Mike | Talk 22:21, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the whole list:

List
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Hopiakuta/Archive 1 Hopiakuta/Archive 2 Hopiakuta/Archive 3 Hopiakuta/Archive 4 Hopiakuta/Archive 5 Hopiakuta/Archive 6 Hopiakuta/Archive 7

I'd say nuke all as meaningless, but some of them contain a portion of the history of his user talk page. Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:41, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I get for not checking back in here before manually tagging at least half of these for deletion. I certainly agree that nuking the whole pile as a bunch of useless nonsense is the correct course of action. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:43, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete all subpages listed above as routine housekeeping. No conceivable reason to retain any. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 22:46, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete slowly. They're definitely not helpful for the encyclopedia, but they're also nowhere close to "deleting dated maintenance categories, deleting unnecessary disambiguation pages, or performing uncontroversial page moves". Nyttend (talk) 22:50, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all Disclaimer: I discovered this page and inquired on AN [1] No value to the project and most are just copies of other pages. User who created them all is now banned. meshach (talk) 00:00, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete every subpage under Special:Prefixindex/User:Hopiakuta and Special:Prefixindex/User talk:Hopiakuta except the talk page archives, from User talk:Hopiakuta/Archive 1 to User talk:Hopiakuta/Archive 5. I've history merged the user's talk page with the unusual titles that the user moved them to, so no history would be lost if the pages with these titles were deleted. I tried to reach out to this user over five years ago, and ... well ... the response I got speaks for itself. Graham87 07:48, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- And I've fixd up the talk page archives. So now, definitely delete everything except the archives. Graham87 08:27, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Just to be super-duper clear, User talk:Hopiakuta/Archive 6 and User talk:Hopiakuta/Archive 7 shouldn't be deleted because they're the talk page archives that I resurrected yesterday. Graham87 05:25, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete all as what is this I don't even. I didn't know Horse_ebooks had a Wikipedia account! — Hex (❝?!❞) 23:16, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all technically he's blocked, not banned. At any rate, I don't know what I am reading, he's beyond incompetent. --Rockstonetalk to me! 23:34, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per above. Nuke 'em. Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:26, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We appear to have a snowball. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:04, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Like a bad penny, this name just keeps turning up. Delete all but user, talk page, and archives. Faux-disabled nonsense, the lot of it. Tarc (talk) 18:34, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Given the unanimity of the responses here I am inclined to believe that we could just start deleting these without waiting for an uninvolved admin to come along and do it. I have noted ( and myself been guilty of) admins often passing up closing discussions that would obligate them to then make thirty or forty admin actions, we could just start working our way through this list and close up once they are all gone. I'll be busy for much of today but could start on it later if nobody else does. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:16, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. That was extremely tedious but now all of this nonsense has been consigned to the dumpster of Wiki-history. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:56, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.