Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 July 28

< July 27	July 29 >

July 28[edit]

File:Siniristi 1933.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2022 August 5. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 05:36, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Siniristi 1933.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:W26CE test pattern.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep for not meeting the threshold of originality. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 22:20, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image appears to be taken from YouTube video Local TV Bandscan for Patchogue, NY with the uploader's logo at the bottom right being scrubbed off. According to his website:

My bandscan and DXing videos contain clips of copyrighted material under fair use. These videos fall under the standard YouTube license.

While a fair use could be possible (depending on whether the now defunct station allow such a use of this), an edited screengrab from a video hosted by someone else on Google Drive is likely not.
NotCory (talk) 03:45, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It might be a screen grab, but I question whether this portion/graphic is even copyrightable. It is a standard test screen with a local station's identifying on it in plain text. It's the same test scores of other stations use: [1] Buffs (talk) 15:18, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and relicense to {{PD-simple}}. Concur with Buffs that the TV station's SMPTE color bars is not eligible for copyright protection. Whpq (talk) 23:06, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Armadillo heels by Alexander McQueen.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: speedy keep per WP:SK#2. Obviously a frivolous nomination. (non-admin closure) GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 18:27, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Had chance exist or can take a CC BY-SA or similar copyright licence Armadillo shoe photos CSS Railfan~Ask Me 12:42, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused as to what you are seeking to do here. Buffs (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sinsyuan, did you even read the file's fair use rationale? If you did, you'd understand why I can't just stroll into the mall and take a freely-licensed photo of a pair. I recommend - strongly! - that you withdraw this absurd FFD so as to not waste the community's time further. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 18:18, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mike Applegate a.k.a. "Magic Mike" onboard USS Nimitz 2009 (CVN-68).jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:13, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo. Out of scope. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:54, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 06:24, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vince Barnett.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:13, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Small, poor quality, unused; we have better images of this person in Commons:Category:Vince Barnett. —howcheng {chat} 00:52, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This discussion was originally created on the log page for July 3, despite being started on July 20. Procedurally relisting so it doesn't get lost.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 13:08, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a low quality image unsuitable for transfer to Commons. Whpq (talk) 14:34, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Miklos Malek by Pal Nanasi.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:13, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Doubtful own work per uploader's talk page. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:15, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Buffs (talk) 22:40, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 06:25, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MillenniumTowerPenang.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:14, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Small. Low res. No metadata. Doubtful own work. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:36, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Buffs (talk) 22:40, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 06:25, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Christian Democratic Party (Chile) logo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:14, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Superseded by File:Logopdc2020.svg. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:42, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Likely falls under threshold of originality. If so, can be moved to Commons. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 14:07, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed w/ HapHaxion. Buffs (talk) 15:22, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, redundant to SVG file. Salavat (talk) 06:26, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IDENTITYTYPES.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Contested proposed deletion. Unused image that could be rendered as a table using MediaWiki markup. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:17, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete using images in place of tables is very poor form for accessibility. A text table using wiki markup would be better for accessibility and easier for other editors to edit and updates. -- Whpq (talk) 21:23, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unused; not an image host. Better formats available. Buffs (talk) 22:39, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 06:26, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.