Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 September 20

< September 19	September 21 >

September 20[edit]

File:Pcom seal.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of a 3D version of the seal of the Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine and a derivative work of the seal (e.g. File:PCOM seal.sm.jpg). I can't find anything giving a year for their seal so I'm not sure whether it is still copyrighted. B (talk) 01:16, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Snoop true ingredients.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a photo of the jumbotron, in which case it would be a derivative work of whoever was producing the video. B (talk) 02:35, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2 up 2 down with central staircase.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 September 28. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:54, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:2 up 2 down with central staircase.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:1910AshtonWest.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Technically un-sourced, but as in use and pre 1923, a disscussion is needed. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:10, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:24, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No source, so it's not possible to verify PD status. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 20:56, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Schlüsselgerät 39.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Issues with incomplete NFCC rationale appear to have been resolved Nthep (talk) 13:11, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete WP:NFCC#1 rationale: no evidence that free images can't be created.

Missing evidence that WP:NFCC#4 is satisfied.

Incomplete source - fails WP:NFCC#10a. Stefan2 (talk) 19:54, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've put a Fair Use tag on it What is wrong with it? Your being absurd. The device no longer exists. So no free image be created. I have show you the email from Rene Stein, from the free book. So WP:NFCC#4 is satisfied. scope_creep (talk)

Scope creep non-free files must be previously published (WP:NFCC#4), so it isn't enough if it was emailed to you. If this photo is from a book, then please identify which. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 11:03, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Seems like the image is indeed published in the source link...
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:26, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep now that NFCC#4 is met. FUR should be completed with "The device no longer exists. So no free image be created." – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 21:00, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PayU Corporate Logo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 September 28. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:55, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:PayU Corporate Logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RaisingTheBar.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No reason to doubt the photo being own work, but the FFD referral is over the photo's subject, there being no information as to what is shown, or it's designer. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:48, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:04, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Paradox Challenge.jpeg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is either fan-art (in which case value is in doubt) or it's a poster/title card and not necessarily the uploaders to re-license. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:52, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:04, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The ParadoX Challenge.jpeg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is either fan-art (in which case value is in doubt) or it's a poster/title card and not necessarily the uploaders to re-license. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:52, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:05, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AguadeInglaterra.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How on earth is an 1828 work not PD-old-70 at least? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:10, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dome91305.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Early upload" attributed to someone other than the uploader name. No other source given. Not immediate F11 as a clarification is needed as to uploader- given source, relationship. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:44, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 13:41, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BlivitCross.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Early upload" - Attributed to David Tuggy , There isn't an obvious connection to the uploader name, but felt FFD was better than F11. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:47, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, essentially orphaned (not used in the main space) with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 13:42, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:UTAH SR-95.PNG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Early upload", No source information, but not immediate F4 as sourcing wasn't enforced as vigorously back then. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:50, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, essentially orphaned (not used in the main space) with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 13:42, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rhodesian-African-rifles-cap-badge.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Claimed as GFDL, but I suspect the cap design is by a third party, and thus not necessarily the uploaders to relicense. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:04, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Krugerrands.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Early" upload - Unused image. Currency design, so a clarification on how this can be licensed as GFDL desirable. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:05, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value given the image quality. Salavat (talk) 13:43, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SmallNid.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Whilst the photo may be the uploaders, the subject is a copyright sculpted work. Likely a Photo of art situation, so a discussion about how to apply NFCC desirable. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:18, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, essentially orphaned (not used in the main space) with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 13:43, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jantar mantar.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is claimed as GFDL-self, but it looks given the sepia tone like it may have been scanned from a third party source. A clarification would be desirable. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:28, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 13:44, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:India-partition.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, Source image was apparently deleted already. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:04, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 13:44, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ingo10k.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused , esoteric file. What's this supposed to be for? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:05, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 13:45, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mach 3 Exploded Labeled.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, Un-numbered file is already at Commons, So unless a key is found this is effectively duplicate? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:08, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 13:45, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nepenthes mikei.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Licensing inconsistency, Metadata and uploader seem to be JeremiahsCPs as author/uploader. License credits a different user. Which is correct? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:13, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 13:46, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NZ wiki meetup 200606a.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 September 28. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:56, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:NZ wiki meetup 200606a.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:William the Silent.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:39, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Early upload", technically unsourced, but almost certainly PD by age, hence the need for a disscussion. Anyone know who the artist is? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:55, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn - As equivalent file was already on Commons at Commons:File:Antonio Moro - Willem I van Nassau.jpg ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:22, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Superheterodyne receiver block diagram.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A better image File:Superheterodyne receiver block diagram.png now exists at commons. This image is a commons shadow. So I propose a deletion instead of page move. DBig Xrayᗙ 21:09, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to PNG file. Salavat (talk) 13:47, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lars Korvald PM.jpeg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

False licensing; w:Template:PD-Norway50 applies, not a US license. Possibly fair use eligible. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 23:49, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.