Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 August 22

< August 21	August 23 >

August 22[edit]

File:The Fresh Prince Opening.ogv[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. De728631 (talk) 18:06, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not a minimal use - it's the entire opening. No actual rationale for use (only "sample"). (ESkog)^(Talk) 03:04, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete NFCC#2 violation, this is substantially the entire song, thereby reducing the commercial opportunities for the act known as The Fresh Prince and DJ Jazzy Jeff. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 03:15, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Daft Punk - Get Lucky Remix.ogg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:14, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No use rationale ("sample" is a word, not a rationale). There is already a clip of the original song in the article; this is only a remix. (ESkog)^(Talk) 03:08, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reduce if this is kept, then it needs to be reduced (NFCC#3b), since it is excessive quality, and overly long due to the repetitive nature of the same. One repetition is all that is needed -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 03:19, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I see no reason for the remix to have its own sample, as it is not notable independent of the main song. Sven Manguard Wha? 06:31, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2112 samples.ogg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:14, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Excessive length; 5:10 is ten times more the generally agreed-upon limit for samples. (ESkog)^(Talk) 03:10, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note that this is also incorrectly tagged as user-created; if for some reason this file is kept, that needs to be amended. (ESkog)^(Talk) 03:11, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment this file is incoherent. It claims to be a sample for one song, clearly it's a whole bunch of samples strung together for one album, with rather abrupt/incorrect/muxed transitions between songs. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 03:24, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ISR-HW5 blue.PNG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:07, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This file is no longer used in any wikipedia article. An updated file exist on commons. commons:File:ISR-HW5blue.png. @Efrat (talk) 08:06, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

~~Move to commons~~ so people can choose between the rectangular or rounded rectangles -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 08:12, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- updated -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 10:45, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It's not really a choice. Rectangular corners are simply incorrect. The rounded corners depicted in the commons file are as per official protocols of the Israel Ministry of Transport. Kind regards --@Efrat (talk) 09:26, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Emma Green Tregaro competing with rainbow coloured nail varnish at the 2013 Moscow Championships.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:00, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fails the NFCC # 8, in that the use of this picture over the text that is already in the article does not significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic due to the very tiny size of the pained nails, and its omission would not detrimental to that understanding. LGA _talk^edits 09:14, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's precisely because the nails are tiny that a relatively large file (some 126,000 bytes) was uploaded, as is allowed in fair use. Of course an interested viewer would click to the full size image where the nails can clearly be seen. It is important to have an image because a poet, for example, wishing to write verse on the gesture would need to see an image, thus fulfilling the basic requirement of fair use that it advances creativity and understanding.

Do you have any other concerns other than this rather technical and minor issue? Elissa Rubria Honoria (talk) 10:50, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Clearly fails NFCC # 1,3,& 8. Werieth (talk) 19:00, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per WP:NFC#UUI and WP:CSD#F7, photo from a commercial agency (Getty) where the photo itself is not the subject of sourced commentary (the commentary is on the event shown in the photo, this is not sufficient). January (talk) 21:25, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Group With Experience masthead.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell ^(talk) 17:31, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This had been tagged for missing evidence of permission by Diannaa, but imo it is much too simple to even have a copyrightable CC license. This file should be kept with PD-textlogo. De728631 (talk) 12:05, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The image is not in use as the logo has been replaced, and there is no article on this subject (it's a discussion group on Flickr, and they have since created a new logo). -- Diannaa (talk) 14:22, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Convert to SVG and move to commons as a Script-e inscribed in solid green circle for use as a generic letter. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 05:58, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not copyrightable but doesn't look useful. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:07, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Emporia State University Mascot, Corky.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Deleted; NFCC #3 states we should only have one copy of a non-free image. Diannaa (talk) 20:04, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Near identical image to File:Corky small.png fails NFC #3 Werieth (talk) 18:58, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded it because it is a clearer version, and not blurred. But, it is also another way to display "Corky", so I was just showing the other way to display him. So, I don't see any reason to delete it. Corkythehornetfan (talk) 03:31, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SSunil.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. Samvritha Sunil is an actress, so this picture of a little boy does obviously not refer to her. The copyright situation of the first upload is unclear either because the uploader claimed they had made a mistake by uploading it. De728631 (talk) 18:04, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Who is this guy, notability??, orphaned/unneeded file. --Addi hockey 10 ^e-mail 22:53, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.