Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WordLift

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:49, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WordLift[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Requested by an IP editor who cannot create this page. I expect they will fill in their deletion rationale here. I am neutral as nominator unless I comment otherwise below. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 18:21, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I‘ll repeat the arguments I put on Talk:WordLift#Proposed deletion:

The company doesn’t seem to meet WP:CORP since it is not the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. The provided sources are often press releases published in minor publications, blogs or can‘t be attributed to the company like the price in 2011 or the book from 2013 when the company was founded in 2017.

Googling for current sources results in the same type of sources as currently in the article: self generated content, no independent reliable sources I could find.

213.55.221.7 (talk) 18:32, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support, created by one-purpose account, only notable due to PR, and reeks of paid editing. ''Flux55'' (talk) 07:31, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:10, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:10, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:10, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:13, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 22:43, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Just another WP:NN mid-tier software company MNewnham (talk) 03:37, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: An article on a company making the WordPress plugin of the same name. Startup coverage and announcements of the company's partnerships and grants are not intrinsically notable, and I am not seeing the coverage needed to demonstrate notability as a company or for the software. AllyD (talk) 12:46, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.