Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White Star (hip hop group)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 06:41, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

White Star (hip hop group)[edit]

Fails to meet notability requirements and appears to violate Wikipedia's self promotion, conflict of interest and future events policies. After I initiall taged the article for a speedy delete review (CSD A7), the editors deleted that tag and added the following sentence to the article: "Their second blood feud is with Wikipedia user, AlphaEta, who is just a hater. It is as of yet unresolved." This entry is a hoax at best. AlphaEta 14:43, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable cover band, if this group even exists. Maybe they'll decide to be in a blood feud with me (it would be kind of cool) Black Harry 15:21, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have to give the editors credit, the entry - including the blood feud comment - is quite funny. Unfortunately it's just not suitable for Wikipedia. AlphaEta 17:33, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It gets my vote for most amusing AfD article of the day, but there is no way it passes WP:N, among any other number of guidelines.
Fails all criteria of WP:MUSIC. Only album: "White Star (late late supa late 2007)". Being an opponent of crystalballery, i advocate to Delete it soon sooner the soonest. --B. Wolterding 18:20, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
delete per nom. Chris 22:25, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as autobio, spam, notability, ~~being biters~~. tomasz. 01:32, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per nom, no sources, etc., etc.. Closenplay 12:46, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"do not delete" this article is legit. i know the group, which really does exist. they are also very notable, and if you were to see them perform, you would definitely agree with me— 69.131.75.25 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding unsigned comment was added at 04:28, 5 June 2007 (UTC) (UTC).[reply]

Note: The above comment was added by an anonymous IP. --B. Wolterding 07:31, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: it was also that Anonymous IP's first and only contribution. BH (Talk) 14:12, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"do not delete" if I were reading this article from the outside I too would imagine it to be a hoax the band is however legit —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 19:51, 5 June 2007 (UTC) (talk • contribs) 64.35.203.130 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.