Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/W34EY-D (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 11:19, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

W34EY-D[edit]

W34EY-D (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject lacks the necessary WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:GNG. While the subject did survive a 2020 AfD, it was under a looser set of notability criteria for television stations than we have today, and the bulk AfD it survived last year was more about some other stations in it that were notable than this one itself. Let'srun (talk) 03:24, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Alabama. Let'srun (talk) 03:24, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: A run-of-the-mill 3ABN station turned a run-of-the-mill HC2/Innovate station with no local content, undoubtedly without any significant coverage at any time. The first nomination was in that "transition" period where the walls were (very) slowly starting to close in on the overpresumption of notability for broadcast stations, but before the 2021 RfC that established that there was no wider consensus for NMEDIA being anything more than an essay that provides advice as to how GNG can be met. WCQuidditch 05:23, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 07:28, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:11, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.