Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victor Cesar Bota

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:59, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Victor Cesar Bota[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG, no usable citations included in the article; an internet search turned up database entries for "THE GRACIES AND THE BIRTH OF VALE TUDO", but no coverage that could serve towards writing an article about that film or Bota. Page also apparently has a history of WP:UPE. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:41, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Brazil. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:41, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and Photography. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:04, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I am not finding any RS to bring this up to notable. 2023 speedy was challenged, but no improvements were made to the page. No reliable sourcing for DoB or any biographical information. WP:TOOSOON. --WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 21:09, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:48, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not provide sufficient independent, reliable sources to verify his notability, with much of the information coming from self-published or primary sources--Assirian cat (talk) 07:22, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete:Absolutely fails GNG, among several other issues. Which is probably why it looks like an SPA attempted to make it look legitimate - by adding a bunch of bad references like blogs and other unreliable sources, failed verifications, trivial mentions, or just "Roku.com". Spagooder (talk) 20:57, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Seems to be NPOV/COI issues. Not much reliable sources found. Fails GNG. ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️^{(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔)} 02:58, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I don't know where to categorise this article but all I can say is that WP:LOTSOFSOURCES doesn't make an article notable. This article doesn't meet verifiable sources which also meets our guideline for WP:RS. However there are certain reason why this article may still be notable maybe in the future but not now. As for WP:ANYBIO, and WP:BASIC, I can't confirm that because almost if not all the sources are unreliable. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 06:14, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.