Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vanessa Van Petten
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 04:19, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Vanessa Van Petten[edit]
- Vanessa Van Petten (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Author with one self-published book (the publisher iUniverse describes itself as "Self Publishing Company"). Fails Wikipedia:Notability (people). No indication of significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject (the "interview with Van Petten for the Los Angeles Times" just quotes her briefly as a random teenager about how "Friends are a big deal"). High on a tree 07:14, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:BIO. Kim Dent-Brown (Talk to me) 09:35, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 12:11, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per BIO, and I'd be damn shocked if this wasn't a WP:COI case as well. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:03, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The person involved had not been a subject of published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject. Thus it fails WP:BIO. --Siva1979Talk to me 16:22, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: fails WP:BIO, WP:COI and WP:SPAM. It's little surprise that the article seques into "Van Petten Seminars," or that it's the sole Wikipedia activity of the creator and editor, User:Updates. RGTraynor 20:32, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Looks like she has big plans to be notable someday, and likely she'll succeed. At which point someone else will create a page about her. Capmango 22:56, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete certainly not notable at this time.Bec-Thorn-Berry 08:24, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.