Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Underworld Gang Wars (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftify‎. plicit 12:39, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Underworld Gang Wars[edit]

Underworld Gang Wars (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article already has templates for improvement due to notability issues. Whilst there are a lot of references, there is little text, and I do not think the product is notable per WP:PRODUCT. It may even tread into self publicity for why this article exists (WP:SPIP). I nominate to delete - if it becomes notable in the future then can re-create, but I don't think this is notable enough to keep. Master Of Ninja (talk) 07:30, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Draftify just like the last discussion, given that there's some evidence the game's development phase is seeing recent progress: [1][2]. Whilst it's clearly WP:TOOSOON, there's enough coverage from sources to suggest there could be something more to it. I'm not really sure what the policy is for leaning in on draftifying when I understand a likely outcome is someone approving the article and we're back to where we started, again. VRXCES (talk) 09:01, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and India. WCQuidditch 11:51, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 13:36, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 14:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.