Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ulrich Hagen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep (withdrawn by nominator). Anas ^talk? 00:49, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ulrich Hagen[edit]

No reliable sources. Unverified claims of notability. Anas ^talk? 19:41, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn —Anas ^talk? 00:49, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Seems to pass WP:PROF criteria 1 and 2 as being well-recognized and imporant in his field. The article needs cleanup, as it's a little too close to the reference listed at the bottom (Radiat Environ Biophys (2000) 39:1), a one page tribute to him in a journal. Flyguy649^talk_contribs 21:04, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep Notable individual (the article needs a good bit of work though). 1976 winner of the prestigious Weiss medal in radiologiy (http://www.graylab.ac.uk/usr/arr/weiss.html), he is old so many of his papers are not online, yet Google scholar lists 65 (including co-authored papers – not unusual in this field). Also, a birthday tribute in the peer-reviewed journal Radiation and Environmental Biophysics suggests notability (https://doi.org/10.1007%2FPL00007680) Bigdaddy1981 22:21, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep per above. Obviously notable, given his awards, high number of published papers, etc. etc. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 22:25, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.