Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ukrain (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was that the repeated copyright violation has been expunged from the article's history, leaving the original non-infringing version of the article. Uncle G 15:17, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ukrain[edit]

Per WP:SPAM, WP:NOTABILITY and WP:VERIFY. Should be speedy but struck down Javit 20:05, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Article reads like an advertisement. G.A.S 20:09, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, recreate, redirect to Ukraine and full-protect the page. That way the history is clean. G.A.S 22:19, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Ukraine and full-protect the page, so this stuff doesn't get recreated.--Atlan (talk) 22:09, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I agree with redirect, which I've now noticed was the original content of the article upon creation. --Javit 22:23, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes - I created the article. But it was to create a redirect. I don't really care what you do so long as the text on that page right now goes away. --mav 23:09, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 12:21, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as copyvio; so tagged. Redirect can be created and protected after deletion. Deor 14:41, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.