Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Campbell (security)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 22:08, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Campbell (security)[edit]

Non notable businessman. Appears to have been created by the subject and then moved here by another. No reason to keep. (Prod removed) Scott Mac (Doc) 08:21, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete - notability not stated. (No, I dont feel creating training and evaluation material is sufficient.) Sadly with such a common name, sourcing is tough for WikiEditors. Of course if Mr.Campbell could mention a ISBN # here in the AFD conversation, we may be able to help. Exit2DOS2000^•T•C• 23:23, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I also note that the Threat Image Projection page was created by the same Editor at the same time. Exit2DOS2000^•T•C• 23:31, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Wikipedia:BLP#Deletion - has been unsourced for months with no interest shown in sourcing it. Kevin (talk) 03:36, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:06, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Insufficient notability per guidelines. ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:27, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.