Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Unreinable Compulsion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Jason LaRay Keener. postdlf (talk) 15:11, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Unreinable Compulsion[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The film does not appear to be notable per Wikipedia's standards. It does not have significant coverage from multiple reliable sources to satisfy the general notability guidelines. Nor does it meet any of the specific criteria at the notability guidelines for films. The best source I could find for this film was this blog, which is not reliable. Erik (talk | contribs) 14:02, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Erik (talk | contribs) 14:03, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirect for now to filmmaker Jason LaRay Keener per WP:NFF and being TOO SOON. Allow back when released and only if it receives the requisite coverage in reliable sources. SCHMIDT, ^{Michael Q.} 00:32, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
MichaelQSchmidt, that article may not be notable, either. It seems like the only reliable coverage is from The Anniston Star. We would need coverage from multiple reliable sources. Erik (talk | contribs) 13:54, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:23, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, | Uncle Milty | talk | 13:32, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 05:40, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.