Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Order of the Briefs
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete as re-creation of deleted content. This is simply Briefsism (AfD discussion) (more AFD discussion) (more AFD discussion) (more AFD discussion) once again. Uncle G 21:20, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The Order of the Briefs[edit]
Probably non-notable fraternity, is it encyclopedic?? CampHorn 20:59, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- No. And the Google results suggest that it's a hoax. Delete Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:01, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, it isn't a hoax, it's real, verifiable, and is a widely popular fraternity at many universities, not just the one mentioned in the article. Really, it's merely an obscure group that is becoming well-known and has been for a while now. It is a widely popular cult with hundreds of members in UK, USA and Ireland. There's no reason to delete it, you would be silly to delete it.
It's real verifiable and not a hoax, no way. Colbber 21:06, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep what a stupid idea to delete this article - has anyone even got a clue why its deletable?? no way should it be deleted, it's notable, briefs are a part of modern culture, get over it. --Llloydfrancer 21:13, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note - Removed repeated voting by Lllyodfrancer. -bobby 21:18, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Take the AfD as a hint to CLEANUP the article - From the article:
- "it is followed as a religion in Northern Ireland, more so than Catholicism."
- If there are people out there who would like this article to remain, statements such as the one above need to be deleted. The entire article needs more citations and wikiformatting. If these changes do not occur during the next few days, I will change my suggested action. I would do cleanup on the article myself, but I'm a boxers fan. -bobby 21:18, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.