Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Leet World

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. @pple complain 15:29, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Leet World[edit]

Recreated CSD A7. Non-Notable movies made from counterstrike. -Flubeca^Talk 17:02, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of machinima deletions. — TKD::Talk 17:16, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable fancruft, delete under WP:WEB--Jac16888 18:16, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This article should not be deleted, seeing that it does meet the Notability Guidelines. I consulted the administrator that first deleted the article, and he has allowed it for creation. FightingRaven531 19:09, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

— FightingRaven531 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. . -Flubeca^Talk 19:34, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - It can't be deleted under WP:WEB as it asserts notability. That's the problem though it only asserts it, it doesn't demonstrate it. It appears to be just another fancruft Machinima series that doesn't stand out from any other of its type. ---- WebHamster 19:14, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The Leet World has been around for approximately 41 days and has gotten approximately 139 plus users in that amount of time. In addition large sums of unregistered users each day come to watch The Leet World. It is a recognized machinima along side other machinimas such as Red vs. Blue. The real bongoboy 22:39, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

— The real bongoboy (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. ---- WebHamster 22:40, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- Inclusion on Wikipedia isn't about popularity; it's about having verifiable information from reliable sources. Red vs. Blue has an article because it has been widely discussed in third-party publications, such as The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and BBC News Online. — TKD::Talk 12:55, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete without prejudice. Allow recreation ONLY if it can meet WP:V which it can not right now. If the editors can find multiple books with a chapter about this, magazine articles about nothing but this, or national news programs reporting on this, then I would change my mine. It all boils down to national news coverage or coverage in multiple national/international magazines. If we don't have at least 2-3 sources like that (minimum) the article has to go. --Brian_{(view my history)}/^{(How am I doing?)} 04:23, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to current lack of multiple reliable sources. The only link given is an interview with the creators, a primary account. Being featured on machinima.com is well and good, but, without more information, that doesn't contribute more than a sentence to the article. — TKD::Talk 12:55, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.