Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Bradley
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 05:06, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Steve Bradley[edit]
- Steve Bradley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
PROD removed, non-notable wrestler, fails WP:V, WP:A and WP:BLP. Darrenhusted 00:04, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per nom and my original vote. Nikki311 00:39, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, nobility is he was signed to a WWE developmental contract for three years but never called up. Nenog 03:37, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. OysterGuitarst 04:13, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletions. —John Vandenberg 09:57, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. MPJ-DK 11:39, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Bradley was one of the most notable WWE developmental wrestlers of the early 2000's.--DanZero 07:52, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I just added more content to the page in addition to a handful of references, please reconsider if this meets notability standards.--DanZero 08:22, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- You can't use youtube as a ref, and his OWW basically says "signed to dev deal, released from deal in 2002" this statement applies to hundreds of wrestlers and is not enough to establish notability. Darrenhusted 11:12, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.