Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spectrophilia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 03:09, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spectrophilia[edit]

Non-notable, referenced by a blog entry, no mention of such a fetish in any sexuality book. bogdan 17:34, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom, the cited "article" is no such thing. Aaronbrick 18:27, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless this thing gets some references. Seems like something people might do, but has no place here until it's documented elsewhere. Cheers, Lankybugger ○ Yell ○ 20:38, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but the name may need changing . Cf succubus -- that is actually a major historical imagined meme, and this seems a dilute version. The name appears to be a neologism. Not all fetish names have to end in "philia" Anyway, people don't have to do it; they just have to talk about it. I will, as usual, try for some references. DGG 03:18, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless better sources can be found. I'll watch the AfD. - Francis Tyers · 10:50, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.