Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Second hand lingerie
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete no assertion of band's notability. Resurgent insurgent 10:37, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Second hand lingerie[edit]
- Second hand lingerie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Contested speedy deletion. Musical diversity is a good thing, and I don't want to discourage punk fans in Damascus, Maryland, but it seems that none of the criteria in Wikipedia:Notability (music) are fulfilled. High on a tree 05:54, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete - doesn't quite meet the Notability standards, orphaned, no blue links (or any links), not referenced, not written in a encyclopedia format.....too much reasons to delete. -Hirohisat 06:32, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete - to answer the assertion on the article, no, it's not. --Haemo 06:37, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Actually, the assertion in the article is enough to get it past the speedy deletion criteria, but far from enough to meet any notability guidelines. GassyGuy 09:45, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.