Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scarboro City Cab
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Riana ⁂ 07:03, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Scarboro City Cab[edit]
- Scarboro City Cab (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Local taxi company with no claim to notability - thousands of taxi companies around the world use adapted vehicles for people with disabilities. This is a multi-nomination with Able Atlantic Taxi, Royal Taxi, Toronto Para Transit and Wheel Chair Taxi. Delete all. BlueValour 19:50, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all as per nom. Bearian 20:28, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all - this is so short of information it doesn't even have a spam link to the firm's website! (Or tell you what country they're in...). Kim Dent-Brown (Talk to me) 20:55, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 00:24, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 00:25, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into WheelTrans. These private contractors are orphans when alone. If listed together underWheelTrans, the public transit provider who contracts with them, they would appear consistent with other articles in Category:Accessible transit services. Canuckle 06:57, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge all to WheelTrans, probably as a table. If they become larger articles in the future, the articles can always be recreated from the resultant redirect. Peterkingiron 22:10, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - sorry , but what is there encyclopaedic to merge? The reason that they do not merit an article is their failure to meet notability requirements not the absence of information. Even if the table becomes larger it would not be a basis for recreation. WP is not a directory of taxi firms. The only justification for a merge/redirect is if there is a reasonable likelihood fo the firms becoming notable. BlueValour 15:30, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Even if it's merged, it shouldn't be mentioned at all. This applies to all the articles listed in the nomination. (→zelzany - fish) 00:11, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.