Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarppam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 05:46, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sarppam[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

On of many non notable indian film stubs created by the same author. Wikipedia is not imdb Gaijin42 (talk) 18:17, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirect for now to P. S. Nivas as an early pre-internet (specially in India) example of his work. It must be noted that most of the Indian Newspaper archives do not store content for before 2000. However, I note a few book sources available under a different spelling of the film's name. The article could be expanded and better sourced by those versed in Malayalam language and Malayalam film. Maybe Project India will take a hand? Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 21:16, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:06, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, it seems 1987 was incorrect, all sources talk about 1979. Seems somewhat notable. Mentioned in http://books.google.com/books?id=dkxDAAAAYAAJ , amongst others. --Soman (talk) 09:54, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:05, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.