Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandra McLellan
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:21, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sandra McLellan[edit]
- Sandra McLellan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
An unsuccessful candidate in the recent election who does not appear to satusfy any other notability criteria. The only thing that google turns up are pages on her written by her own party Valenciano 11:02, 3 June 2007 (UTC) Yes. Very true. This article lacks more notability than a tissue. It's also a stub; and Sandra McLellan has not done anything important. It should be deleted. Meldshal42 11:23, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non notable failed candidate Nick mallory 11:36, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not notable.--Svetovid 11:37, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — No search engine hits for me; non-notable. *Cremepuff222* "As cool as grapes..." 18:34, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete -- non-notable, poorly sourced, nothing special there. Turgidson 21:38, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.