Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salem Urban Development Authority

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 00:52, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Salem Urban Development Authority[edit]

Salem Urban Development Authority (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The information in this article is already at Salem metropolitan area (India) but the creator objects to a redirect there so bringing here for consensus. Mccapra (talk) 07:41, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So, kindly go through it, Metropolitan Area & Metropolitan Development Authority is different from each other.

Yes they are different from each other, but that does not mean that we need a separate article about each one. The information about this topic is already included in the article about the metropolitan area, so this is a WP:CFORK. Mccapra (talk) 09:02, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I, thought, Same were followed in the articles that, I have mentioned above. In those articles too, contains more or less same informations. May I, know, is there any rules for such articles for existing, meanwhile, not for this one. Ungal Naan2.0 (talk) 14:49, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The rule is we don’t fork content, so if information is already in one article we don’t recreate it in another. The only reason to split info out from an existing article is to significantly expand it, which this one doesn’t. Otherwise we just create a redirect so anyone searching for information finds it easily. Mccapra (talk) 18:33, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So, instead of nominating for deletion, you can tag the article as "need improvement". That may help to develop articles with additional informations. Visitors also can add some information with thier knowledge. But, still, I can't understand, what additional contents you had seen in the articles like Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority and Chennai Metropolitan Area. Can you explain is there any such special rules. Ungal Naan2.0 (talk) 14:17, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Just another Municipal Development Authority.
There are 100 municipal corporations, 2100 Nagar Panchayats, and 1500 municipal councils in India1
User4edits (talk) 13:10, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ofcourse, 100 Municipal Corporation, 2100 Nagar Panchayats and 1500 municipal councils. But here, it is not Municipal Corporation or Nagar Panchayat or Municipal Council. It is Urban Development Authority. Not all those you have mentioned will not have such authority. Wikipedia may offers visitors regarding specific topics. So, this article may exist, while others are existing. Ungal Naan2.0 (talk) 14:52, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please see WP:NCORP, and without going into FALLACY, here are a few:
Just go to Google, and search * Development Authority, and you will get 100s of them. Thanks, User4edits (talk) 05:15, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So what, Why can't create articles for them ? Wikipedia has articles for all the 1000s of cities wright ? So, is there any problem with articles for Development Authorities ? Ungal Naan2.0 (talk) 08:38, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 16:22, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Star Mississippi,
Hope you are doing good.
Actually, I haven't got answered for my previous questions for my earlier defence. Kindly go through it, and make way for retain this article. Ungal Naan2.0 (talk) 06:50, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That is not the role of an administrator at AfD, and I don't have the subhect matter interest to act as an editor here. However the onus is on you who wants to retain it to find WP:CORP level sourcing, not anyone else. Star Mississippi 14:12, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I don't see a consensus here yet and no one has commented upon the nominator's suggestion of a Redirect closure.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:46, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:35, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.