Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SMEEN

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 07:45, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SMEEN[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, non-notable neologism. PROD tag was removed without comment or improvement, so here we are at AFD. Dawn Bard (talk) 17:31, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hawaii-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:09, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:10, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:MADEUP. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 19:13, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NEO. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 10:27, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Automatic Strikeout (T • C) 03:07, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.