Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rufai Waris
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:30, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Rufai Waris[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Rufai Waris (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Draftified the article for sile purpose of being improved. Yet moved back to main space without addressing citation needed tags and notability. Clearly fails WP:GNG. A thorough name of the artist cannot be seen on google /bing search before talking about references. The article cited sources which seems to be obvious blog and non of them is reliable. Otuọcha (talk) 10:03, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Otuọcha (talk) 10:03, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:10, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: I firmly believe that article is justified and should not be deleted. It can be strengthened. I have already added two additional sources which I believe are stronger than what is cited above. The number of links to the page should not be a criteria for deletion.Pfomma (talk) 5:27, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:11, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: sources are press releases or promotional puff pieces by dubious publications that have no indication they meet WP:RS. S0091 (talk) 18:21, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:49, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I have thoroughly researched about the subject of the article and must say there was no sign of notability. Failed WP: ANYBIO, WP: SIGCOV. Otuọcha (talk) 11:57, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Fails WP:GNG or WP:NSINGER. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:41, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete subject has not been discussed in reliable sources to establish notability. Best, Reading Beans 17:37, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.