Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruby Empire

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Saga of the Skolian Empire. (non-admin closure) f e minist 13:11, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ruby Empire[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources, this is an excessive amount of detail. It isn't one of the major empires in the book series it is from. Power~enwiki (talk) 05:45, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Either keep basically because I like it, or merge most of it into Saga of the Skolian Empire, which is a repository for merged article in the series and where the characters from here are already mentioned. Debresser (talk) 05:57, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 04:07, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:00, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:00, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:00, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Merge [1] seems a brief mention, [2] (pp. 47-48) is more in depth, but not by much. I don't see any notability of the Ruby Empire separate from Saga of the Skolian Empire, and believe it would be best presented in that article. Jclemens (talk) 21:09, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Saga of the Skolian Empire considering the lack of coverage on this particular topic that warrants a separate article. Aoba47 (talk) 15:41, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.