Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renate Da Rin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 00:04, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Renate Da Rin[edit]

Renate Da Rin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so hopefully we can resolve this. Boleyn (talk) 18:25, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for soft deletion; see edit summary in Special:Permalink/587416055, which restored the article per WP:REFUND/as a contested PROD.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 20:34, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 00:06, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. I couldn't find any significant coverage in WP:LIBRARY, Google Books, Google Scholar, or general web searches. Fails WP:BIO / WP:GNG. Jfire (talk) 02:11, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Youtube, various coaching websites, social media links. I don't find sourcing we'd be able to use for an article. Oaktree b (talk) 21:57, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.