Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pronunciation of asteroid names

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 17:27, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pronunciation of asteroid names[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article does not mention a single source even though unreferenced and OR flags have been added more than six years ago. It is likely that there are no sources for many of the pronunciations in this article. Seeing as there are abundant Category:Lists of asteroids, nothing is lost when this article is deleted.

I am also nominating the following related pages because it has the same flaws:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

--mach 🙈🙉🙊 12:15, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:19, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:19, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:19, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both as they fail WP:NOTDICT by being a usage guide in addition to what the nom said. -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions})
Delete both. If a reliable source discusses the pronunciation of a notable asteroid, then that can be included in the article about that asteroid. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 00:11, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both. Pronunciation can be applicable to invidividual articles, we don't need a massive list of them all. Ajf773 (talk) 09:19, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If sources can be found, this information can be merged into individual articles where they exist. Asteroids which aren't notable enough for an article aren't worth recording this information. Modest Genius ^talk 18:28, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.