Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Professional Scrapbooker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as blatant spam. AKRadecki^Speaketh 20:05, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Professional Scrapbooker[edit]

This topic does not deserve its own article. The creator made it to highlight one website listed in the links section. This topic can be covered sufficiently in a subsection of the Scrapbooking article, and that is where it belongs. MamaGeek ^{(talk/contrib)} 11:48, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

KeepThe article can't stand the way it is now, but it can be improved so its not constantly in 2nd person and a "How to" guide. I think that an article can only be deleted per WP:Nobility; otherwise it can be improved, as is the case here. W1k13rh3nry 11:57, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. The article does not seem to have significant content; as a second choice, whatever content is considered useful can be merged into Scrapbooking. --Metropolitan90 14:17, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article as it stands is a personal essay about why this article should exist. Without sources I see no reason to keep, as this information would be appropriate for inclusion on the Scrapbooking page.--Xnuala (talk)(Review) 16:03, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete In addition to notability issues, this article appears to be entirely original research, per WP:OR. -Chunky Rice 17:01, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

KeepThe article will be improved, I promise. -User:Yummytork
- You created this article as spam "on behalf of your clients." That's not what Wikipedia is for. MamaGeek ^{(talk/contrib)} 19:36, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.