Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pretty Handsome Awkward

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:36, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty Handsome Awkward[edit]

Wikipedia is not crystal ball. Hornandsoccer ^Talk 02:29, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Affirmative, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, not sourced either. Hello32020 02:48, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Leaning on speedy delete per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Used 3rd studio album. I think a redirect may work better in this case since the song exists. --Wafulz 02:53, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Crystal ball.--ZayZayEM 02:54, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I don't think you would want to see the words "possible" and "rumored" in the first paragraph, do you? Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Sr13 (T|C) 03:02, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless reliable sources can be found before AFD close. Zetawoof^(ζ) 06:29, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No Sources, no good information, No article. DBZROCKS 20:47, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No sources, and it starts out with the word possible Alto Sax 456 21:05, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, WP:CRYSTAL, no sources. Throw it away already. ;-) --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 00:23, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete if reliable sources cannot be found, but Keep if some are: the article looks like there are good reasons to expect the single. Nihiltres 12:56, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.