Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pianeta Design

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:58, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Pianeta Design

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Pianeta Design (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NCORP, coverage is limited to non-independent and/or trivial coverage. Searching online, I found media portals reprinting pianetadesign.it's articles, and a false positive in the form of this research paper that has a similar title but otherwise appears unrelated, but nothing that would meet WP:ORGCRITE _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:06, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture, Companies, and Italy. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:06, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.