Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pamela E. Swett

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎. Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Curbon7 (talk) 20:54, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pamela E. Swett[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPROF. Notability is a bit shaky here. I found a review of her work at http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03071020600906925, but I doubt it that is enough, I am really more inclined to combine this and several other things to establish the notability of this professor though, if anyone can help. Her Dean-ship doesn’t count, Joukowsky Family Dissertation Award does not appear to be a notable one, etc. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:18, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Women. Shellwood (talk) 10:31, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notability is not shaky. Swett meets WP:NAUTHOR with multiple reviews of multiple books. I have added several of them to the article. DaffodilOcean (talk) 11:06, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@DaffodilOcean well, I guess if I had not put this up you wouldn’t have known there’s an article that needs to be improved. Which is the essence of this discussion like I said in my nom statement. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:57, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Vanderwaalforce: see WP:DINC and WP:BEFORE. A good outcome is not a justification for a bad nomination. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:38, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Meets WP:GNG, per WP:HEY improvements by DaffodilOcean. Netherzone (talk) 14:27, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, History, Canada, Pennsylvania, and Rhode Island. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:17, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:AUTHOR, now made apparent through reviews listed in the article. I won't say WP:HEY because the notability was there all along, but nevertheless, thanks, DaffodilOcean! —David Eppstein (talk) 18:39, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Based on the improvements made to the article. I will withdraw this at this point. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:16, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.