Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nobobangla

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 13:39, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nobobangla[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any information that would verify this. Tried searching under "Nobobangla" and "Nobo bangla" (second one suggested by Google) but found nothing. "Language in India publication" giving me an Adobe error so can't check it, and Nobobangla.org is dead. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:09, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A Google Scholar search shows that this vowel rich Bengali script was developed by S Musa. I was not able to find any independent reliable sources that devote significant coverage to the script, so it is not notable. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 05:07, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 05:36, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Bengali script - this is only a brief article, and merging it with the article on Bengali script might make it easier to follow. Vorbee (talk) 09:02, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into the 'Standardisation' section of Bengali script. Article subject doesn't meet WP:GNG but it would add meaningful content to that section. Cesdeva ^(talk) 10:13, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:19, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Bengali script. Subject fails WP:GNG but there is some meaningful content here. GenuineArt (talk) 13:46, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. DBig Xrayᗙ 21:42, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. DBig Xrayᗙ 21:42, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Bengali script, there just isn't reliable sources out there. Neither is the script much used. — f r ⁺ 06:02, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- If there are no reliable sources, why should we merge this? Unreliable information should not be merged. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:33, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- This is just another self claimed linguist + language reformer's pipe dream, somehow managed to get published in a journal. Shah M Musa is an computer engineer and is not an linguist. His proposal has not been studied upon and has no significant relevance. We cannot merge it to Bengali script, as this is fundamentally a different script and will give this non-substantial design undue coverage. --nafSadh ^{did say} 15:27, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- This is a highly relevant comment that should be strongly considered by the closer of this AfD. A merge would give undue weight to a non-notable proposed script. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:33, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.